Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?

Posted By: Confused
Date: Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 12:19 a.m.

Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play" in the past?

I'm not really sure what the ICBE mean when they say "pay for play".

I think it means if you're a borough professional or a developer and you contribute toward someone's campaign, you get to "play" in exchange because you did "pay"?

Didn't Mary Hogan take money from developers and borough professionals in all of HER past campaigns?

Does that mean she's telling us that she was unethical for all those years?

Is she saying that in exchange for "pay" from them, that SHE let them "play"?

Does anybody else see this as so hypocritical?

I hear she tried to get the Democratic nomination for mayor.

But she got passed over in favor of Nancy Merse and her ambitions wouldn't let her just run for council again.

So she jumps aboard another ship that lets her run as mayor for THEM.

And now if you take money from developers or borough professionals you're unethical . . . . . but not THEN?

Take a look at her campaign $ reports from past campaigns.

If she's pointing the finger at others now, maybe she should turn that finger around.

Messages In This Thread

Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Confused -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 12:19 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Larry -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 7:35 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
jim -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 7:49 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
sister jean -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 9:11 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Andrew Rosenman -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 1:15 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 4:11 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
It ain't that complicated, folks -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 4:32 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 5:33 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
william rutledge -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 6:10 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
huh -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 6:30 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
william rutledge -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 7:26 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 12:02 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
sister jean -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 9:19 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFANF -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 12:00 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
sister jean -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 2:45 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 6:06 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 11:57 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 10:20 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 11:55 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 10:17 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
sister jean -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 5:16 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 1:43 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 4:04 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 5:12 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
J Schwartz -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 6:06 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 10:39 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Andrew Rosenman -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 6:15 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 10:13 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 9:27 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 1:56 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 3:31 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 4:55 p.m.

Re: I'm NOT voting..
jim -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 6:09 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 10:03 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 12:51 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 10:01 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Dani-X -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 3:05 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Larry -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 5:08 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 6:12 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Larry -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 7:10 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 12:28 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 9:54 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 11:28 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 3:36 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Dani-X -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 9:21 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 9:49 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Dani-X -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 10:58 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
J Schwartz -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 1:56 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Dani-X -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 3:13 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
J Schwartz -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 11:35 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Thursday, 30 October 2003, at 12:09 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
jim -- Thursday, 30 October 2003, at 8:07 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Thursday, 30 October 2003, at 12:53 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 3:24 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Dani-X -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 7:33 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Thursday, 30 October 2003, at 11:35 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Dani-X -- Thursday, 30 October 2003, at 1:33 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
william rutledge -- Thursday, 30 October 2003, at 3:55 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Thursday, 30 October 2003, at 5:37 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Friday, 31 October 2003, at 9:50 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Thursday, 30 October 2003, at 9:59 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 12:13 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 3:15 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 6:04 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
jim -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 6:27 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Thursday, 30 October 2003, at 11:21 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Thursday, 30 October 2003, at 1:33 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Thursday, 30 October 2003, at 5:28 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Friday, 31 October 2003, at 10:31 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Dani-X -- Thursday, 30 October 2003, at 2:00 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Thursday, 30 October 2003, at 5:26 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Dani-X -- Thursday, 30 October 2003, at 10:50 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Friday, 31 October 2003, at 10:26 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Friday, 31 October 2003, at 10:15 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
sister jean -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 10:06 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 12:35 p.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
Poppy -- Wednesday, 29 October 2003, at 9:37 a.m.

Re: Did Mary Hogan let developers "pay for play"?
TRFKANF -- Tuesday, 28 October 2003, at 9:57 a.m.

Edgewater Message Board is maintained by Edgewater Online with WebBBS 5.12.

Home Page | Edgewater Business Directory | Discover Edgewater! | Local Information & Resources | Government & Schools Online Community: Message Board Discussion Forum, Chat Room | News, Events & Activities | Transportation, Traffic & Weather Contact Us | Advertise With Us Copyright © 1999-2005 Virtual Town Pages, LLC.  All rights reserved.. You are visitor to the Edgewater Message Board since 9/10/01.